My name is Harry E. Briscoe and I am an innocent man who has been wrongfully convicted of felony murder, and aggravated robbery. I have been burdened with this wrongful incarceration for over 17 years now. I also have two so-called co-defendants, Richard Segines, and Sharon Dockery who are both innocent, and wrongfully convicted concerning the robbery and murder of a man named Ali Abu Atig. A man none of us ever met in our lives.
I will reveal details and display the authenticated documents that will establish doubt in the minds of the readers concerning the trial proceedings that convicted us. I will also reveal the unreasonable application behind the three of us becoming a "convenience" for the Warrenville Hts. Police Department and the Cuyahoga County Prosecutor's Office, where our story reveals more than a few homicide detectives, an evidence technician, and the Cuyahoga County Prosecutor felt compelled to falsify supplement reports indicating that Richard Segines and my fingerprints (latent fingerprints) were found on the victim's van (see attached legal documents),
However, I will start with the invalid complaint and false arrest warrant - the beginning of the process into our criminal justice system.
In short, a complaint is a written statement of the essential facts designating the applicable statute or ordinance, and must be made upon oath before a person authorized by law. See Ohio Criminal Rules of Procedure, Crim. R. 3.
Attached hereto is what purports to be a valid complaint and arrest warrant which in legal terms must be declared "de facto," that is, illegitimate but in effect. Illegitimate is something against the law; unlawful, or in this case, of no legal effect that was presented to a Magistrate Judge, to be passed off as a legal and valid complaint and arrest warrant.
For a valid complaint and arrest warrant, and one that is constitutionally as well as statutorily effective, that is - valid, it must be presented and accompanied with a 'jurat." A jurat, pronounced (ioor-at) is defined as "a certification added to an affidavit stating when and before what authority the affidavit was made. (1) that the person "signing" the document did so in the officer's [someone who holds an office of trust, authority, or command] presence, (2) that the signer appeared before the officer on the date indicated, and (3) that the officer administered an oath or affirmation to the "signer", who swore to or affirmed the contents of the document." See Black's Law Dictionary 10th Ed. 2014.
Basically, a jurat is a signature endorsement from someone (officer) who is authorized to have you raise your right hand and swear that the allegations written in the complaint, by the person who wrote the complaint, are true. See State v. Green, 548 N.E. 2d 334. When looking at the complaint attached hereto, there is no signature at the bottom of my complaint, confirming the legal endorsement by an officer authorized by law to administer oaths.
Without a proper endorsement from an officer authorized by law to administer oaths to tum a complaint · to a legal document that would activate the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge to initiate an arrest warrant, you're being unconstitutionally arrested - in other words, kidnapped and taken against your will.
See State of v. Green (below), cited above and State v. Sharp, 2009 Ohio 1854.
Copyright © 2024 Wrongfully convicted Harry Briscoe - All Rights Reserved.
Powered by GoDaddy Website Builder
We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.